THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 38
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte ELMER J. HOLLSTEIN,
JAMES T. WEI,
and CHAO Y. HSU
_____________
Appeal No. 96-0394
Application 07/989,7291
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before KIMLIN, PAK and ELLIS, Administrative Patent Judges.
PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the refusal of the
examiner to allow claims 9 and 10, which are all of the claims
remaining in the application.
1Application for patent filed December 10, 1992. According
to appellants, this application is a continuation of Application
07/686,713 filed April 17, 1991, now abandoned, which is a
continuation-in-part of Application 07/565,588 filed August 9,
1990, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007