THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 18
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte TOMOHIKO DOUKEN, ISAO KIZUYA,
and KIKUO TOMITA
_____________
Appeal No. 96-0526
Application 08/008,2911
______________
HEARD: JULY 14, 1997
_______________
Before JERRY SMITH, LEE, and CARMICHAEL, Administrative Patent
Judges.
CARMICHAEL, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of Claims 1-7 and
9-11. The other claim remaining in the application is Claim 8,
which has been indicated as directed to patentable subject
matter. Final Rejection at 7.
We reverse.
1Application for patent filed January 25, 1993.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007