Appeal No. 96-0563
Application 07/540,839
from the jaw engagement area for disengagement with said
spline on said shaft;
d. and means for moving said latch from one of said
first position and said second position to the other of said
first and second position.
The references of record relied upon by the examiner in
rejections of the claims under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) and under
35 U.S.C. § 103 are:
Myers 869,255 Oct. 29, 1907
Beran 1,006,348 Oct. 17, 1911
Bubb 1,287,211 Dec. 10, 1918
Plungis et al. (Plungis) 2,709,939 Jun. 7, 1955
Claim 30 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as
being anticipated by Beran.
Claims 30 and 31 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over Plungis in view of Bubb.
Claims 30 and 32 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over Plungis in view of Bubb and Myers.
Rather than reiterate the examiner's statement of the
above rejections and the conflicting viewpoints advanced by
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007