THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 12
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte JOHN S. MATTIS, JAMES C. MILROY,
PAUL VON DER LIPPE, GERALD L. SHIMIRAK,
PAUL S. CHAN and SEBASTIANO SCARAMPI
_____________
Appeal No. 96-0733
Application 08/173,8051
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before MEISTER, ABRAMS and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
1Application for patent filed December 22, 1993. According
to appellants, the application is a division of Application
07/922,460, filed July 30, 1992, now U.S. Patent No. 5,273,449,
issued December 28, 1993, which is a division of Application
07/499,117, filed March 26, 1990, now U.S. Patent No. 5,153,988,
issued October 13, 1992.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007