Appeal No. 96-0750
Application 07/944,561
This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134
from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1-7, 10-15 and
18-23. Claims 8 and 16 have been cancelled. The final rejec-
tion indicated that claims 9, 17, 24 and 25 were allowed. An
amendment after the final rejection was filed on July 25, 1994
and was entered by the examiner. In response to the appeal
brief, the examiner indicated that claims 11-15, 18, 19 and 23
were allowed [answer, page 1]. The examiner’s answer changed
the rejection of the claims by dropping one of the applied
references. Appellants filed an amendment concurrently with a
reply brief in response to the new ground of rejection in the
answer. In response to this amendment and the reply brief,
the examiner indicated that claims 3-7, 10 and 22 were allowed
[supplemental answer, page 1]. Consequently, only claims 1,
2, 20 and 21 remain rejected in this application and form the
basis of this appeal.
The claimed invention pertains to a method and appara-
tus for indicating the presence or absence of non-periodic RF
pulses.
Representative claim 1 is reproduced as follows:
1. A pulse signal level detector for detection of non-
2
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007