THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 11 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ________________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ________________ Ex parte WILLIAM S. YAMANASHI and ARUN A. PATIL ________________ Appeal No. 97-0879 Application 08/101,2281 ________________ ON BRIEF ________________ Before COHEN, McQUADE and BARRETT, Administrative Patent Judges. McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This appeal is from the final rejection of claims 1 through 13, all of the claims pending in the application. Application for patent filed August 3, 1993. According1 to appellants, the application is a continuation-in-part of Application 07/967,685, filed October 27, 1992, now abandoned. -1-Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007