Ex parte TANAKA et al. - Page 4




          Appeal No. 96-1279                                                           
          Application 07/870,982                                                       

                                       OPINION                                         
               "Anticipation is established only when a single prior art               
          reference discloses, expressly or under principles of inherency,             
          each and every element of a claimed invention."  RCA Corp. v.                
          Applied Digital Data Systems, Inc., 730 F.2d 1440, 1444,                     
          221 USPQ 385, 388 (Fed. Cir. 1984).                                          
               Appellants argue that Kojima does not:  (1) sense the                   
          control channel signal contamination; (2) detect the contaminated            
          control channel signal level; (3) respond to the control channel             
          signal contamination level detected (Reply Brief, pages 2-4).                
          The arguments are summarized as follows (Reply Brief, page 4):               
               Kojima only uses the control channel for conventional                   
               control functions.  Thus, Kojima does not respond to                    
               contamination in the control channel or sense such                      
               contamination.  Although Kojima does teach reducing the                 
               transmission power of a base station, this reduction occurs             
               in the congestion mode in response to congestion at one base            
               station and excess capacity at a neighboring base station.              
               Kojima never teaches or suggests adjusting the transmission             
               power in response to a contaminated control channel signal              
               level.                                                                  
          We are in full agreement with appellants' arguments.                         
               The examiner errs in finding that "the traffic adjusting                
          signal . . . is same as the control channel signal contamination"            
          (Examiner's Answer, page 3; Supp. Examiner's Answer, pages 1-2).             
          "Traffic" is "the number of channels currently used in the radio             
          communication for each base station" (col. 1, lines 59-60).                  

                                        - 4 -                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007