THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 31
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte SERGE CADIEUX and YVON LEVESQUE
____________
Appeal No. 96-1410
Application No. 08/321,3841
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before STAAB, McQUADE, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
1Application for patent filed October, 11, 1994. According
to the appellants, the application is a continuation of
Application No. 08/161,995, filed December 2, 1993, now
abandoned, which was a continuation of Application No.
07/979,369, filed November 20, 1992, now abandoned, which was a
continuation of Application No. 07/851,270, filed March 13, 1992,
now abandoned, which was a continuation of Application No.
07/601,491, filed October 22, 1990, now abandoned, which was a
continuation of Application No. 07/389,701, filed August 4, 1989,
now abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007