THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 26
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte HIROMI JUSO, YUKIHIKO HAIKAWA,
and YUKIHARU HOSONO
____________
Appeal No. 96-1421
Application 08/065,773
____________
HEARD: 17 September 1997
____________
Before THOMAS, JERRY SMITH, and TORCZON, Administrative Patent
Judges.
TORCZON, Administrative Patent Judge.
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final
rejection of claims 1-15. (Paper 14.) No other claims are
pending. (Paper 7 at 1.) We reverse.
FINDINGS OF FACT
We have reviewed the record in its entirety in light of the
arguments of Applicants and the examiner. Our decision presumes
familiarity with the entire record. A preponderance of the
evidence of record supports each of the fact findings.
1. The application is entitled "Information reproducing
apparatus by which reading operation from recording medium is
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007