THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 25
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte DONALD E. WEDER
__________
Appeal No. 96-1698
Application 07/926,0981
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before LYDDANE, ABRAMS, and STAAB, Administrative Patent Judges.
LYDDANE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the final
rejection of claims 1, 4, 6 through 10, 23 through 32, 34 through
1Application for patent filed August, 5, 1992.
According to appellant, this application is a continuation-in-
part of Appliction 07/803,318, filed December 4, 1991; which is a
continuation-in-part of Application 07/707,417, filed May 28,
1991, now abandoned; which is a continuation of Application
07/502,358, filed March 29, 1990, now abandoned; which is a
continuation-in-part of Application 07/391,463, filed August 9,
1989, now abandoned; which is a continuation-in-part of
Application 07/249,761, filed September 26, 1988, now abandoned;
and a continuation-in-part of Application 07/687,701, filed April
18, 1991, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007