THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte JOHN C. CASTEL, DAWN S. CASTEL
and MICHAEL R. HALL
________________
Appeal No. 96-1830
Application 08/101,6681
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before McQUADE, NASE and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent
Judges.
McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
1Application for patent filed August 3, 1993. According
to appellants, the application is a continuation of
Application 07/953,570, filed September 29, 1992, now
abandoned, which is a continuation of Application 07/771,505,
filed October 4, 1991, now Patent No. 5,188,586, issued
February 23, 1993.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007