THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 42
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte YUICHI ONO, MITSUAKI HATORI,
and HIROSHI INOUE
________________
Appeal No. 96-1835
Application 08/207,1161
________________
HEARD: DECEMBER 9, 1997
________________
Before STONER, Chief Administrative Patent Judge, McQUADE and
NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This appeal is from the final rejection of claims 1, 2, 14,
18 and 19, all of the claims pending in the application.
1Application for patent filed March 7, 1994. According to
appellants, the application is a continuation of Application
08/007,486, filed January 22, 1993, now abandoned, which is a
division of Application 07/750,480, filed August 27, 1991, now
abandoned.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007