THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 26
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte MORDECHAI HAMMER
____________
Appeal No. 96-1870
Application 08/088,5701
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before LYDDANE, STAAB, and McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judges.
McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This appeal is from the final rejection of claims 3 and 5.
Claims 1, 2 and 4, the only other claims pending in the
application, stand withdrawn from consideration pursuant to
37 CFR § 1.142(b).
1Application for patent filed July 9, 1993. According to
the appellant, the application is a continuation-in-part of
Application 07/923,657, filed August 3, 1992, now Patent No.
5,322,334, issued June 21, 1994; which is a continuation-in-part
of Application 07/912,415, filed July 13, 1992, now Patent No.
5,324,086, issued June 28, 1994.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007