Ex parte SCOTT et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 96-1931                                                           
          Application 07/995,635                                                       


          constitute all the claims remaining in the application.  An                  
          amendment after final rejection was filed on July 28, 1995 and               
          was entered by the examiner.                                                 
          The claimed invention pertains to an alumina article                         
          having a surface coated with a coating of oxide of one or more               
          metals selected from the group consisting of Y, Hf, La, Zr, Dy,              
          Sc and mixture thereof.  The invention also relates to this                  
          article being formed for use as an arc discharge tube for a                  
          sodium vapor arc discharge lamp.                                             
          Representative claims 1 and 2 are reproduced as follows:                     
               1.  An alumina article having at least one surface wherein              
          at least a portion of said surface is coated with a transparent              
          coating of oxide of one or more metals selected from the group               
          consisting of Y, Hf, La, Zr, Dy, Sc and mixture thereof.                     
               2.  A hollow alumina tube suitable for use as an arc tube               
          for a sodium vapor arc discharge lamp, wherein an interior                   
          surface and an exterior surface of said tube are essentially                 
          continuously coated with a coating of oxide of at least one metal            
          selected from the group consisting of Y, Hf, La, Zr, Dy, Sc and              
          mixture thereof.                                                             
          The examiner relies on the following references:                             
          Koury et al. (Koury)                3,377,498      Apr. 09, 1968             
          Sulcs et al. (Sulcs)                3,723,784      Mar. 27, 1973             
          Coaton et al. (Coaton)              4,256,988      Mar. 17, 1981             
          The examiner=s answer cites the following additional                         
          reference although it is not officially applied in a new ground              
          of rejection:                                                                

                                          2                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007