Appeal No. 96-1948
Application 07/995,952
Upon return of the application, the examiner should reconsider the rejection under
35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, taking into account the correct legal standard. If the
rejection is maintained, the examiner should restate the rejection and indicate in a specific
manner why one skilled in the art can not reasonably ascertain the scope of the claims on
appeal taking into account the supporting specification and relevant prior art.
This application, by virtue of its “special” status, requires an immediate action.
MPEP § 708.01(d). It is important that the Board be informed promptly of any action
affecting the appeal in this case.
REMANDED
Sherman D. Winters )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
William F. Smith ) APPEALS AND
Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
Teddy S. Gron )
Administrative Patent Judge )
Patrea L. Pabst
Arnall, Golden & Gregory
2800 One Atlantic Center
1201 West Peachtree Street
5
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007