THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 16 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte DONALD E. WEDER __________ Appeal No. 96-1997 Application 08/176,6141 __________ ON BRIEF __________ Before COHEN, LYDDANE, and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judges. LYDDANE, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on an appeal from the final rejection of claim 8, which is the only claim remaining in the application. 1 Application for patent filed January 3, 1994. According to appellant, this application is a continuation of Application 07/984,815, filed December 3, 1992, now Patent No. 5,274,900, issued January 4, 1994. 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007