THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 9
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte CAROLYN LETERSKY
_____________
Appeal No. 96-2100
Application 08/149,8441
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before STONER, Chief Administrative Patent Judge, and STAAB and
NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
STONER, Chief Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Carolyn Letersky (“appellant”) appeals from the final
rejection of claims 1, 3, 4 and 6, all of the claims pending in
Application for patent filed November 9, 1993.1
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007