Ex parte GORLICH - Page 10




          Appeal No. 96-2297                                                          
          Application 08/117,446                                                      


          made from common knowledge and common sense of the person of                
          ordinary skill in the art without any specific hint or                      
          suggestion in a particular reference.  See In re Bozek, 416                 
          F.2d 1385, 1390, 163 USPQ 545, 549 (CCPA 1969).                             


               With the above in mind, we recognize the following                     
          practice. Supermarket or retail outlet consumers, at the time               
          of appellant's invention (circa 1993), would have expected                  
          packaged meat product, as displayed in a retail outlet, to be               
          placed in a plastic bag (the bag being closed off with a                    
          closure tie) when the display packaging showed signs of                     
          leakage or the packaged product was surrounded with a                       
          significant amount of visible liquid; additionally, of course,              
          the retail outlet would have been expected to place the                     
          purchased packaged meat in a plastic or paper bag at the                    
          checkout counter.  In each of the above circumstances wherein               
          already packaged meat is placed into a bag, it can fairly be                
          said that the packaged meat product and tray would have been                
          covered thereby.                                                            




                                          10                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007