Paper No. 26 THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _______________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _______________ Ex parte SALMON PIENAAR ______________ Appeal No. 96-2302 Application 08/260,0581 _______________ ON BRIEF _______________ Before COHEN, LYDDANE and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judges. COHEN, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal from the refusal of the examiner to allow claims 9 through 11, as amended subsequent to the final rejection. In the answer (page 1), the examiner indicated that Application for patent June 15, 1994. According to appellant, this1 application is a continuation of Application 08/013,302, filed February 4, 1993, now abandoned. 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007