Ex parte PIENAAR - Page 1

                                                            Paper No. 26              

                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      
          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                  
          (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and                    
          (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                  

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                               Ex parte SALMON PIENAAR                                
                                 Appeal No. 96-2302                                   
                              Application 08/260,0581                                 
                              ON BRIEF                                                
          Before COHEN, LYDDANE and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judges.           
          COHEN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
                    This is an appeal from the refusal of the examiner to             
          allow claims 9 through 11, as amended subsequent to the final               
          rejection.  In the answer (page 1), the examiner indicated that             

                    Application for patent June 15, 1994.  According to appellant, this1                                                                
          application is a continuation of Application 08/013,302, filed February 4, 1993,
          now abandoned.                                                              


Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007