Ex parte ANTHONY B. CASTRO et al. - Page 1

                                  THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                                
                The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)                                                                
                was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not                                                               
                binding precedent of the Board.                                                                                               
                                                                                           Paper No. 15                                       

                                    UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                 
                                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                  
                                                        AND INTERFERENCES                                                                     
                 Ex parte ANTHONY B. CASTRO, PHILLIP L. LAFFOON, JAMES P. LAWHORN                                                             
                                                        and GARY T. SUITS                                                                     
                                                        Appeal No. 96-2416                                                                    
                                                    Application 08/206,4471                                                                   
                                                                ON BRIEF                                                                      

                Before MEISTER, STAAB and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                 
                STAAB, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                           

                                                        DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                    
                         This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s final                                                            
                rejection of claims 1-15, all the claims in the application.  We                                                              
                         Appellants’ invention pertains to an ink jet printing                                                                
                system, and in particular to an ink delivery system therefor that                                                             

                         1Application for patent filed March 4, 1994.                                                                         

Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007