Appeal No. 96-2476
Application 07/890,785
(Figure 1). The teachings of this reference thus do not
establish a prima facie case of obviousness with regard to the
subject matter of independent claim 14 or, it follows, of any
of the claims dependent therefrom. Nor is this deficiency
alleviated by considering Stein, which was cited by the
examiner for its teaching of utilizing a nose wheel mounted at
the forward end of the skate.
The rejections are not sustained, and the decision of the
examiner is reversed.
REVERSED
)
JAMES M. MEISTER )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
NEAL E. ABRAMS )
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
)
) INTERFERENCES
)
CHARLES E. FRANKFORT )
Administrative Patent Judge )
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007