THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 14
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte PAUL A. HUMMEL
____________
Appeal No. 96-2653
Application No. 08/395,6811
____________
HEARD: October 17, 1997
____________
Before COHEN, NASE, and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1 and 2, which are all of the claims pending
in this application.
We REVERSE.
1Application for patent filed February 28, 1995. According
to the appellant, the application is a continuation-in-part of
Application No. 08/199,559, filed February 22, 1994, which is now
abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007