Appeal No. 96-2780 Application 08/162,362 passenger seating unit. Claims 2 and 13 are illustrated of the claims on appeal and read as follows: 2. A support frame for a vehicle passenger seating unit which provides a plurality of seat locations abreast, said support frame comprising two transverse parallel beams joined by a plurality of spaced parallel longitudinal members substantially perpendicular to said beams, said longitudinal members defining elongated first portions having bores in which said beams extend, and wherein at least the longitudinal member at one side of said support frame is a one-piece member that includes an integral second portion which extends away from said first portion and an integral third portion which is elongated and extends away from said second portion and generally in parallel with said first portion, said third portion providing at least a major part of an armrest. 13. A one-piece longitudinal member for use in a support frame for a vehicle passenger seating unit that includes a plurality of spaced, parallel beams, said longitudinal member defining an elongated first portion having a plurality of openings in which said plurality of beams can extend so as to connect said beams to said longitudinal member, an integral second portion which extends away from said first portion, and an integral third portion which is elongated and extends away from said second portion and generally in parallel with said first portion, said third portion constituting an integral armrest part. THE PRIOR ART The following references were relied on by the examiner: Marrujo et al. (Marrujo ‘441) 4,440,441 Apr. 3, 1984 Moscovitch 4,603,903 Aug. 5, 1986 THE REJECTIONS Claim 17 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Marrujo ‘441. Claims 2, 3 and 6-15 stand rejected 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007