THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 19
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JOHN HORVAT and MARY A. HORVAT
____________
Appeal No. 96-3408
Application No. 08/194,9041
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before CALVERT, ABRAMS, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's rejection
of claim 6, which is the only claim pending in this application.2
We REVERSE.
1Application for patent filed February 14, 1994.
2Finally rejected claim 5 was canceled and replaced with
claim 6 by the amendment filed November 17, 1995 (Paper No. 14).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007