Ex parte BERTOLINI - Page 8




          Appeal No. 96-3571                                                          
          Application No. 29/021,754                                                  


                    A properly filed terminal disclaimer would overcome               
          this new ground of rejection on obviousness-type double                     
          patenting.                                                                  
                    Accordingly, the decision of the examiner rejecting               
          the design claim under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed, and a new               
          rejection of the design claim has been made on the ground of                
          obviousness-type double patenting pursuant to the provisions                
          of 37 CFR § 1.196(b).                                                       
                    Any request for reconsideration or modification of                
          this decision by the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences              
          based upon the same record must be filed within one month from              
          the date of the decision 37 CFR § 1.197.  Should appellant                  
          elect to have further prosecution before the examiner in                    
          response to the new rejection under 37 CFR § 1.196(b) by way                
          of showing of facts not previously of record, a shortened                   
          statutory period for making such response is hereby set to                  
          expire two months from the date of this decision.                           







                                          8                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007