Ex parte WILLIAM E. SHULTZ - Page 8




          Appeal No. 96-3702                                                          
          Application 08/208,688                                                      


          spreader” recitations in claim 21 are read in the context of                
          their surrounding claim language and in light of the underlying             
          disclosure, it is quite clear that the “mandrel expansion collar”           
          reads on disclosed element 16, 16a and that the “mandrel                    
          spreader” reads on disclosed element 58.  The fact that the                 
          terminology used in the specification to describe these elements            
          might be somewhat inconsistent with the terminology used in the             
          claim is not sufficient in this case to render claim 21                     
          indefinite.                                                                 
























                                          8                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007