THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 19 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _____________ Ex parte JAMES A. SUNDBERG _____________ Appeal No. 96-3845 Application 08/209,2601 ______________ HEARD: December 11, 1997 _______________ Before COHEN, MEISTER and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judges. COHEN, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 through 3, 19, and 21 through 24. Claims 4 through 18, the only other claims remaining in the application, stand allowed. Appellant’s invention pertains to a method of handling capsules, a capsule handling system, and to a capsule handling method. An understanding of the invention can be derived from a 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007