THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte DONALD A. BRAULT, DOUGLAS A. CAHILL,
RICHARD S. HIMMELWRIGHT and DENE H. TAYLOR
________________
Appeal No. 97-0222
Application 08/115,5611
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before KIMLIN, WEIFFENBACH and ELLIS, Administrative Patent
Judges.
KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-37,
42, 43 and 44, all the claims remaining in the present
application. Claim 1 is illustrative:
1. A process for preparing a protected ink image comprising
A) imagewise depositing one or more ink images on an ink
receptor, the ink receptor comprising
1Application for patent filed September 3, 1993.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007