THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 61
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte MICHAEL D. BARBERE
________________
Appeal No. 97-0684
Application 08/171,3431
________________
HEARD: October 14, 1997
________________
Before ABRAMS, STAAB and McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judges.
STAAB, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Michael D. Barbere (appellant) appeals from the final
rejection of claims 1, 4-9, 13 and 14, which constituted all the
claims remaining in the application at the time of final
rejection. Subsequent to the final rejection an amendment
canceling claims 8 and 9 was entered. Thus, only the final
1Application for patent filed December 22, 1993.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007