THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 25
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte RICHARD L. KRONENTHAL, ARTHUR A. GERTZMAN
and DOUGLAS R. VALENTINE
________________
Appeal No. 97-0774
Application 08/121,5251
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before McCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, and ABRAMS
and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
McCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s
rejection of claims 1, 2, 8, 10, 11, 18, 26, 29 and 45 under
35 U.S.C. § 103. The only other claims still pending in the
application have been withdrawn from consideration as being
directed to a non-elected invention.
1 Application for patent filed September 16, 1993.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007