Ex parte ANDERSON - Page 1




                                  THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                                
                The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)                                                                
                was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not                                                               
                binding precedent of the Board.                                                                                               
                                                                                           Paper No. 16                                       

                                    UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                 
                                                              __________                                                                      
                                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                  
                                                        AND INTERFERENCES                                                                     
                                                              __________                                                                      
                                                  Ex parte W. KYLE ANDERSON                                                                   
                                                              __________                                                                      
                                                        Appeal No. 97-0904                                                                    
                                                    Application 08/105,6991                                                                   
                                                              __________                                                                      
                                                                ON BRIEF                                                                      
                                                              __________                                                                      

                Before CALVERT, LYDDANE and PATE, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                               
                PATE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                            

                                                        DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                    
                         This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 45 and                                                          
                46.  The other claims in the application stand as follows:                                                                    
                claims 25-27, 30, 31 and 33-42 have been indicated by the                                                                     
                examiner as allowable.  Claims 22-24, 28, 29, 32, 43 and 44 have                                                              
                been cancelled.  Claims 1-21 have been indicated by the examiner                                                              



                         1Application for patent filed August 11, 1993.                                                                       
                                                                      1                                                                       





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007