Appeal No. 97-1019
Application 08/063,463
§ 103 as being unpatentable over Stephens in view of Weissenbach
and Propst.
Turning to the rejection of claims 27-31 and 58-68 under 35
U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Stephens in view of
Weissenbach, Propst and either Augis or Jorgensen, we have
carefully reviewed the references to Augis and Jorgensen but find
nothing therein which would overcome the deficiencies we have
noted above with respect to Stephens, Weissenbach and Propst.
This being the case, we will not sustain the rejection of claims
27-31 and 58-68 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 based on these references.
The examiner’s rejections of the appealed claims are
reversed.
REVERSED
IAN A. CALVERT )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
JAMES M. MEISTER ) APPEALS AND
Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES
10
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007