Appeal No. 97-1977 Application 07/970,862 hidden location "are inherent from the disclosure." In this regard, the examiner has also indicated (answer, page 3) that [t]he removing and opening of the holder of Williams is considered to be done in a “single maneuver” to the extent this is defined in the claims as the Williams device is closed by loop and hook fasteners which allow easy opening of the holder. The examiner next discusses the Connell patent, urging that it discloses another type of holder, specifically one used by a skier, wherein a ski trail map may be placed in the holder in order that it may be viewed from time to time. Based on the collective teachings of Williams and Connell, the examiner concludes that [i]t would have been obvious [to one of ordinary skill in the art] to place a ski map in the transparent pocket (40) of Williams in view of the teachings of Connell et al. in order for the active person to view a ski map from time to time (answer, pages 3-4). After reviewing the applied Williams and Connell patents and the respective positions of the examiner and appellant, we must agree with appellant's position that the examiner has failed to establish a prima facie case of 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007