THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 26
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte SIEGFRIED RIEK,
KARL-HEINZ BACHMANN
and
THOMAS GAISELMANN
_____________
Appeal No. 97-2600
Application 08/500,0911
______________
HEARD: September 15, 1997
_______________
1Application for patent filed July 10, 1995. According
to appellants, the application is a continuation of Applica-
tion 08/168,213, filed December 17, 1993, now U.S. Patent No.
5,431,151, issued July 11, 1995; which is a continuation of
Application 07/779,730, filed October 23, 1991, now U.S.
Patent No. 5,271,380, issued December 21, 1993.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007