THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 20
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte IMRE HLAVICSKA
_____________
Appeal No. 97-2867
Application 29/012,0931
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before COHEN, GARRIS, and CARMICHAEL, Administrative Patent
Judges.
CARMICHAEL, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of the claim in
the present design patent application.
We reverse.
The Examiner’s Answer lists the following prior art:
Mattchen 4,298,074 Nov. 3, 1981.
1Application for patent filed August 23, 1993. According
to Appellant, this application is a continuation-in-part of
Application No. 29/009,496 filed June 15, 1993, now abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007