Interference No. 103,715 assigned issued an Order to Show Cause against both parties on the ground of no interference-in-fact. Neither party has responded to the Order in a timely manner. Accordingly, the following judgment is entered. Judgment It is hereby adjudged that an intererence-in-fact does not exist. Fu-Tai Liou and Charles Ralph Spinner, the junior party, are entitled to a patent containing claims 1, 3-7, 9-13, and 23-36, which claims correspond to the count in interference. Ajit S. Manocha and Virendra V. S. Rana, the senior party, are entitled to their patent containing claims 1-4, which claims correspond to the count in interference. ) ANDREW H. METZ ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT WILLIAM F. PATE, III. ) Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND ) ) INTERFERENCES ) JOHN C. MARTIN ) -2-Page: Previous 1 2 3 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007