THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 30
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
FLOYD S. SMITH and MARK E. CARIM
Junior Party1
v.
ERICH W. SAUTER
Senior Party 2
__________
Interference No. 103,850
___________
JUDGMENT
___________
Before URYNOWICZ, SOFOCLEOUS and DOWNEY, Administrative Patent
Judges.
1Application 08/074,064, filed June 9, 1993, now Patent No.
5,415,868, issued May 16, 1995. Assignor L. Perrigo Company.
2Application 08/323,160, filed October 14, 1994. Accorded
benefit of Application 08/180,550, filed January 12, 1994, now
Patent No. 5,511,361, issued April 30, 1996; and Application
07/927,066 filed August 7, 1992, now Patent No. 5,317,849, issued
June 7, 1994.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007