Paper No. 31
THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte LLOYD KAMO
______________
Appeal No. 93-1311
Application 07/279,7131
_______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before John D. Smith, Garris and Pak, Administrative Patent
Judges.
Garris, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal which involves claims
1 through 37, which are all of the claims in the application. 2
1Application for patent filed December 5, 1988.
2We observe that the claim amendment filed August 6, 1992 (i.e.,
Paper No. 18), although authorized by the examiner to be entered, has not
been clerically processed with respect to the requested amendment of claims
2-4, 6-11, 13, 14, and 16 (see amendment page 1) or of claims 22 and 35 (see
amendment page 2). This matter should be rectified upon return of the
application to the jurisdiction of the examiner.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007