Ex parte THOMPSON et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 93-2518                                                          
          Application 07/696,059                                                      


                    Appellants’ invention is a method for geophysical                 
          prospecting of a subsurface region.  Claim 1 is exemplary of the            
          subject matter on appeal:                                                   
                   1.  A method for geophysical prospecting of a                     
          preselected subsurface region, comprising;                                  
                    generating an electric field of sufficient strength to            
          penetrate said preselected region to a depth of interest,                   
                    converting said electric field to a seismic wave in at            
          least one porous subsurface earth formation in said preselected             
          region containing at least one fluid, and                                   
                    detecting said seismic wave with a seismic detector.              
                                   THE REFERENCES                                     
                   The following prior art was relied on by the examiner             
          in support of new grounds of rejections made by the examiner in             
          the examiner’s answer:                                                      
          Evjen                    2,172,557                Sep. 12, 1939             
          Taylor, Jr.              2,172,778                Sep. 12, 1939             
          Zimmerman, Jr.           3,392,327                July  9, 1968             
          Tsao et al. (Tsao)       3,660,754                May   2, 1972             
          Thompson                 4,904,942                Feb. 27, 1990             
          Morrison, Jr. et al. (Morrison), “Electrokinetic Energy                     
          Conversion in Ultrafine Capillaries,” The Journal of Chemical               
          Physics, Vol. 43, No. 6, (Sept. 1965), pages 2111-2115.                     
                                   THE REJECTIONS                                     
                   Claims 1, 8-12, 14, 16-18, 22, 23 and 25-29 stand                 
          rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over                   
          Thompson or Zimmerman in view of Morrison.                                  

                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007