THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 26
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte PAUL YAO-CHEUNG WANG
_____________
Appeal No. 93-3228
Application 07/796,0231
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before WILLIAM F. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge, and
McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, and WALTZ,
Administrative Patent Judge.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner’s final rejection of claims 7 through 14, 21 through
1 Application for patent filed November 22, 1991. According to appellant, the
application is a division of Application 07/063,968, filed June 19, 1987, now Patent No.
5,110,595, granted May 5, 1992, which is a continuation-in-part of Application
07/016,845, filed February 20, 1987, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007