THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 43 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte GUY DUTOT ____________ Appeal No. 94-0591 Application 07/755,6101 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before WINTERS, JOHN D. SMITH, and GRON, Administrative Patent Judges. GRON, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL UNDER 35 U.S.C. § 134 Application for patent filed September 5, 1991. According to1 applicant, this application is a continuation of Application 07/453,359, filed December 19, 1989, now abandoned; which is a continuation of Application 07/223,120, filed July 22, 1988, now abandoned. Applicant claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 119 of French Application 87.10407, filed July 23, 1987.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007