THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 36
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte JOHN M. BIRMINGHAM
_____________
Appeal No. 94-0786
Application 07/861,3321
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, PAK and WARREN, Administrative Patent
Judges.
JOHN D. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal pursuant to 35 USC § 134 from the final
rejection of claims 10 through 13.
Claim 10 and claim 13 are representative and are reproduced
below:
10. In a method for cracking dicyclopentadiene to
produce cyclopentadiene monomer, wherein molten dicyclopentadiene
1 Application for patent filed March 25, 1992. According to appellant,
the application is a continuation of Application 07/569,657, filed August 20,
1990, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007