THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 23 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte ANNA BRANDAZZA, PAOLO SARMIENTOS, and GAETANO ORSINI __________ Appeal No. 94-1484 Application 07/536,5561 __________ ON BRIEF __________ Before WILLIAM F. SMITH, GRON, and WEIMAR, Administrative Patent Judges. WILLIAM F. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final rejection of claims 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, and 8. Subsequently, claim 1 was canceled and replaced by claim 9. 1Application for patent filed July 11, 1990. 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007