THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 25
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte PIERRE CHABARDES
and CLAUDE MERCIER
_____________
Appeal No. 94-1868
Application 07/864,3851
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, WARREN and WALTZ, Administrative Patent
Judges.
JOHN D. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal pursuant to 35 USC § 134 from the final
rejection of claims 1 through 6, 8 through 20, and 24 and 25.
Claim 1 is representative and is reproduced below:
1. A process for the preparation of a terpenic ketone
comprising the steps of:
1 Application for patent filed April 6, 1992. According to appellants the
application is a continuation of Application 07/652,049, filed February 8, 1991
(ABN).
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007