THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 11
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte JAMES L. BERGEY, WERNER TSCHOLLAR,
CARY S. YONCE and JAMES C. KAWANO
_____________
Appeal No. 94-2113
Application 07/801,2071
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before WINTERS and WILLIAM F. SMITH, Administrative Patent
Judges, and McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge.
Per Curiam
Decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134
The appeal is from a decision of the Primary Examiner
rejecting claims 1 to 4, 11 to 16 and 19-28. The examiner and
applicants seem to agree on the essential facts. We affirm but
1 Application for patent filed December 2, 1991, which is a
continuation-in-part of Application Number 07/524,266 filed
May 15, 1990. The real party in interest is Bristol-Myers Squibb
Company.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007