THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte BERNARD GRUSHKIN
____________
Appeal No. 94-2794
Application No. 07/702,5331
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before METZ, JOHN D. SMITH, and PAK, Administrative Patent
Judges.
PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s
refusal to allow claims 1, 2, 5 and 32 which are all of the
claims pending in this application.
The subject matter on appeal is directed to a toner
composition. The critical features of the toner composition
1Application for patent filed May 20, 1991.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007