THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 43
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte RUTH G. CHIOU,
CHERYL C. BROWN, JEANNETTE A. LITTLE,
KEITH D. STANLEY, AUSTIN H. YOUNG,
ROBERT V. SCHANEFELT, DONALD W. HARRIS,
HELEN D. COONTZ, CAROLYN J. HAMDAN,
JODY A. WOLF-RUEFF, LORI A. SLOWINSKI,
KENT R. ANDERSON, WILLIAM F. LEHNHARDT,
and ZBIGNIEW J. WITCZAK
__________
Appeal No. 94-2895
Application 07/908,7281
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before KIMLIN, GARRIS, and WARREN, Administrative Patent Judges.
GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.
1Application for patent filed July 6, 1992. According to appellants, the application
is a continuation of Application 07/578,994, filed September 6, 1990, now abandoned;
which is a continuation-in-part of Application 07/483,208, filed February 20, 1990, now
abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007