Ex parte KERI - Page 1




                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      
          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                  
          (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and                    
          (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                  


                                                            Paper No. 35              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                     __________                                       
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     __________                                       
                                 Ex parte IMRE KERI                                   
                                     __________                                       
                                 Appeal No. 94-3022                                   
                               Application 07/855,4901                                
                                     __________                                       
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                     __________                                       

          Before HAIRSTON, JERRY SMITH and FLEMING, Administrative Patent             
          Judges.                                                                     
          FLEMING, Administrative Patent Judge.                                       
                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of               
          claims 1, 2, 4, 11, and 13 through 15.  Claim 3 is objected to              
          for being dependent upon a rejected base claim.  Claims 5 through           
          10 and 12 have been canceled.                                               

               Application for patent filed March 23, 1992.  According to appellant,1                                                                     
          this application is a continuation of application no. 07/619,006, filed     
          November 28, 1990, now abandoned.                                           
                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007