Appeal No. 94-3222
Application 07/815,630
inconsistent with our review function. See 35 U.S.C. § 7
(“The Board . . . shall . . . review adverse decisions of
examiners . . . .”) Accordingly, we vacate the examiner’s
final rejections and remand the case to the examining corps
for action consistent with this opinion.
This application, by virtue of its “special” status,
requires an immediate action, M.P.E.P. § 708.01(d). It is
important that the Board be informed promptly of any action
affecting the appeal in this case.
VACATED and REMANDED
SHERMAN D. WINTERS )
Administrative Patent Judge)
)
)
)
WILLIAM F. SMITH ) BOARD OF PATENT
Administrative Patent Judge) APPEALS AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
TEDDY S. GRON )
- 13 -
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007