THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a
law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 19
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte PAUL STOLIS, JOHN D. VALA
CLIVE E. CATCHPOLE,
JOHAN P. BAKKER,
GARY B. COPENHAVER,
DAVID J. CONCANNON,
ROBERT T. ROURKE,
and DAVID J. VALICE
_____________
Appeal No. 94-3631
Application 07/883,5131
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before HAIRSTON, JERRY SMITH and CARMICHAEL, Administrative Patent Judges.
JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner's
rejection of claims 1-15 and 22-33, which constitute all the claims remaining in the application.
The claimed invention pertains to an image source means for use in taking pictures of checks
1Application for patent filed May 15, 1992.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007